Comments on: Bush: Saving Trees http://www.bozzysworld.com/2003/12/04/bush-saving-trees/ News, Comedy, D-Bags Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:29:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Blaine Hilton http://www.bozzysworld.com/2003/12/04/bush-saving-trees/#comment-1521 Blaine Hilton Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 http://www.bozzysworld.com/2003/12/04/bush-saving-trees/#comment-1521 The thinking is something akin to the fact that if they are dead then they can't be sick. Hopefully we get someone else in the President's seat in 2004. The thinking is something akin to the fact that if they are dead then they can’t be sick. Hopefully we get someone else in the President’s seat in 2004.

]]> By: fry http://www.bozzysworld.com/2003/12/04/bush-saving-trees/#comment-1522 fry Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 http://www.bozzysworld.com/2003/12/04/bush-saving-trees/#comment-1522 i think that it is more the protection of people, not trees. i beleive that we are more important than trees, and if the wildfires continue people could get hurt. stoping them is the best solution, and water cant get the job done. i think that it is more the protection of people, not trees. i beleive that we are more important than trees, and if the wildfires continue people could get hurt. stoping them is the best solution, and water cant get the job done.

]]> By: Rark http://www.bozzysworld.com/2003/12/04/bush-saving-trees/#comment-1523 Rark Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000 http://www.bozzysworld.com/2003/12/04/bush-saving-trees/#comment-1523 The comment that "people are more important than trees" is a specious argument. There is no need to cut down trees to make people safe. And to the contrary, cutting down trees makes people LESS safe by contributing to erosion, flooding, landslides and climate change. The only thing cutting forests benefits is the logging industry. I hate the whole people versus trees argument because trees are NECESSARY for human health. By the way, fires are much more likely to happen in areas that have been cut over, since cutting out the big shading trees leaves lots of space for the much more flamable brush and undergrowth to take over. The comment that “people are more important than trees” is a specious argument. There is no need to cut down trees to make people safe. And to the contrary, cutting down trees makes people LESS safe by contributing to erosion, flooding, landslides and climate change. The only thing cutting forests benefits is the logging industry.

I hate the whole people versus trees argument because trees are NECESSARY for human health.

By the way, fires are much more likely to happen in areas that have been cut over, since cutting out the big shading trees leaves lots of space for the much more flamable brush and undergrowth to take over.

]]>