Blood or no blood, that is the question

By Anonymous -
I take it we have all seen violence in movies.

Do you think it is better for children to watch violence with the realistic blood, or violence with no bloody effects at all.

I say this now because "I, Spy" is on HBO and it has no bloody violence. Owen Wilson or Eddie Murphy shoot somebody, and they just fall down, no blood.

How does a child perceive this? That guns don't hurt people?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reverse Racism is still Racism.

By Anonymous -
This text has been floating around MySpace and probably the entire Internet, I've seen it here and there, but I guess it's my turn to share it. There's some epithets, but there's actually a really good point behind it: reverse racism is still racism. You call me "Cracker", "Honkey", "Whitey", "Casper" and you think it's OK. But if I call you nigger, towelhead, sand-nigger, camel jockey, beaner, wetback, saltwater nigger, gook, or chink it's not ok because you call me a racist. You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you, so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live? You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day. You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day. You have Yom Hashoah You have Ma'uled Al-Nabi You have the NAACP. You have BET. If we had WET(white entertainment television) we'd be racists. If we had a White Pride Day you would call us racists. If
Read more